Tag Archives: advising

Caveats and Critiques of Graduate School: When the Personal Becomes Political

Every once in awhile someone makes me feel bad for critiquing graduate school so much. They remind me that I’ve benefited from grad school, or had some good experiences, or gained something from having been a grad student. All of that is true. Sometimes I cringe to think that any of my former professors or advisors could find this blog and they might be angry or upset that I write mostly negatively about my grad school experience. I’m 32 but I still want my teachers to like me. I’ve been mulling a response to these kinds of critiques and want to state a few caveats that apply when I’m critiquing or discussing grad school. I also want to draw an analogy between the kind of institutional critique I (and other post/ex-ac writers) make about grad school and the kind of critique I (and other birth activists) have made about institutionalized birth. In both instances, the personal becomes political, and people’s feelings tend to get hurt.

First, some caveats. Continue reading

Working Definitions of “Academic Advising”

I’ve been at my new job for a month as of today and I’ve hit a tipping point as a trainee: my ratio of time spent training versus time spent working with students is finally trending in the student direction. Yay! I really like students. I actually went through a bit of student withdrawal during the first week of classes, really missing that first day energy. Now I’m meeting students in small groups, as well as holding walk-in hours and appointments, and the difference in my attitude and energy is remarkable.

One aspect of our jobs is to track our “development” as advisors: to see how we mature, change, and transform as we gain experience and knowledge. Our Director suggested that we sit down every month or so to define what academic advising means to us and track changes over time. Here’s what I’ve come up with so far. Bear in mind that the kind of advising I do is focused on 1st and 2nd year students, before they transfer to their majors or apply to selective programs.

Academic Advising is…

Trying not to ruin someone’s life.

This was my working definition for several weeks. At the end of the day, if I could say “I didn’t ruin his life!” I knew I’d done okay. I didn’t forget a crucial thing that could jeopardize their application, progress to graduation, visa, or financial aid. I didn’t say yes when I meant no, or say something was definite when it isn’t, or that something is fine when it is not. When learning the ropes, advising is about not fucking up.

Just like teaching, minus the grading, plus more email.

Know how students are always asking you questions that the syllabus answered? Or things you covered in class, just a minute ago? Advising is full of that. A dozen emails asking about add/drop deadlines, which you just clarified in an email that you just sent. A dozen requests for an appointment, when those have to be scheduled online or through the front office, which is clearly stated and linked in your signature.

I help first year students navigate the same bureaucracy now that I did as a teacher. I direct them to the same resources (fin aid, counseling), sympathize with the same roommate conflicts and bouts of homesickness. It’s very similar in terms of the personal relationship with students. What it lacks, completely, is after hours duties (I don’t check my U email at all when I’m home) and, huzzah, grading!!

Pusher.

The Romans' Road To Heaven Chris via Compfight

A lot of my training focuses on learning about relatively unknown majors that aren’t obvious to students, but are really cool (like Health Promotion, or Environmental Planning and Policy). Then, I have to talk to students to figure out what they really want (which is rarely what they say they want: e.g. “I want to major in Bio” is code for “I vaguely want to work in health but I probably don’t understand how intense Bio really is and I have the mistaken notion that this is the only way to get into that world.”) and push them in the direction of alternatives. This goes double when it becomes clear that students are not going to be admitted to the major or program of their choice. Then I have to make those back ups or “parallel plans” seem like the perfect fit (which they often are, although students may not see it that way).

Reality check.

A lot of advising, at least here, is about getting students to face their denial. It’s about looking at a transcript full of Bs and Cs and saying, yeah, that GPA is not going to make the cut for Business School. Really. Even if you magically do everything right this semester and make all As. Or, yeah. Unfortch, this math placement exam? It’s mandatory, and it says that you really do have to take College Algebra before you can get started on that Actuarial Science major, which, by the way? Is 99% math and wants a minimum of 3.5 for admission. Or, you did take those courses at the community college. Unfortunately, the transcript folks determined that they will not count towards your major, and no, there really is nothing you can do about it, and yes, you really have to retake them here.

You’d be surprised how long a student can keep up a fantasy that the path they’ve chosen will work out, even if it’s extremely clear that it’s not going to work out. We are like the wicked queen’s mirror who has to say, Actually, you aren’t the fairest of them all. There are clearly about 120 students more fair than you. It requires a balance of forthrightness and kindness that is challenging to strike, but it’s also really rewarding to help a student negotiate that serious process. Some advisers here call it “dream reshaping.”

That’s all I’ve got for now. Advising is clearly a field in which people undergo enormous growth and transformation over several years. Everyone says I can expect to hit my stride in about 3 years. I keep hoping I can accelerate that, though! ;)

Have a great holiday weekend!

Academia Myths & Mismatches E-Course Review

Jo Van Every and Julie Clarenbach are post-academic career coaches. I’ve seen both of them crop up on Versatile PhD and in various post-academic google searches, and became curious about their services for those of us exiting academia. They offer a free “Myths & Mismatches” e-course at their website, and were kind enough to allow me to write a review of it. (I received no compensation, and I approached them for permission to write the review.)

Academic Coach Taylor needs to branch out into post-academic coaching!!

Myths and Mismatches is free, first of all. So that’s good, especially when you are a broke-ass ex grad student. And they don’t hook you in to a bunch of spammy crap when you sign up: bonus! You receive the “course” in 10 emails over the course of 10 days, alternating between the myths (lies about academic life) and mismatches (structural factors of academia that misalign with aspects of regular life or individual personality).

The myths are bracingly vulgar and completely accurate. In Myth #3, “Merit is everything,” they write:

One of academias very favorite myths is that everything within it is based on merit. Only the best students are accepted to the graduate program. The best students get fellowships and scholarships. The best students get the best jobs. The best work gets published. The best candidates get tenure. And then theres the flip side: If you didnt get in to the program of your choice, its because you werent good enough… Even when we choose to walk away, these stories of failure dog us. (In our own minds, if nowhere else.) Leave before tenure? Its because you couldnt hack it. Decided not to go on the job market because you didnt want to stay in academia? You wouldnt have gotten a job anyway. Decided not to finish graduate school because its making you hate the universe? You werent smart enough to finish.

Excuse our language, but this is all a fucking load of steaming crap.

Anyone who’s spent a few hours with grad students will find the myths resonant and refreshing.

The mismatches are a little harder to make sense of, just because I wasn’t ever really sure what “mismatch” means. Does it mean I’m a mismatch for grad school? Or grad school is a mismatch for the real world? The mismatches seem to come from nowhere and have no locus or agency. For example, in Mismatch #1, “Mismatch of Opportunity,” Jo and Julie write:

So much of academic success is really lucky timing — being in the right place at the right time with just the right set of skills and credentials and time and money and space. Some of this can be engineered — but some of it can’t. And because it can’t, many academics find themselves with a mismatch of opportunity… They aren’t failures any more than not being able to be President because you were born overseas is a failure. It’s an unfortunate situation, but it’s got nothing to do with you personally. A mismatch of opportunity is just that — a mismatch — and it’s more about timing and luck than it is a comment on your worth as a person or quality as an academic.

I wasn’t entirely sure what to make of this (or some of the other mismatches): they seem to say, “It’s no one’s fault, that’s just how it is.” I appreciate the effort to alleviate guilt and negativity, but am not sure “mismatch” is the best way to describe these structural aspects of academia that make them horrible places for most people to make a life. At the same time, I’m not sure what else I would call them, and certainly don’t know if I could find another M word that would give them that nice alliteration in the titles!

If you’re looking to deprogram from the cult of academia, this is a great place to start, just to reorient yourself to reality and boost your confidence moving forward. But I think these would be even more powerful as preventative measures: if you’re a college kid thinking about graduate school, sign up for this e-course. If you’re smart and kicking ass in your coursework and wondering where to take your hotshot self next, take this e-course. Like forest fires, graduate school is best prevented. Read these essays and ask yourself if you are really the exception to the rule for every mismatch. Ask yourself if you have fallen for some of the myths they describe – I certainly had – and what changes when your eyes are open to these fantasies about academic life. Then please, do anything but go to grad school. Hire Jo and Julie, or post a comment here, or go camping: just say no to grad school.

Job Interview, The Problem of Crappy Grad Advisors, & The Sweet Taste of Freedom

First, the good news: I have an interview next week for an admin position that I am very hopeful about. I’d work with first year students (my fave!), have the possibility of family-friendly hours and awesome health insurance, and work with some people who I really like. In pretty much every way, it would be ideal, and therefore I am trying to assume I will not get it so that if I don’t, it won’t be too crushing.

If this does work out, everything would be ok financially and we could unclench a little. I bought a pair of discount slacks at Loft and am going to have to do some stain treating and creative draping to be presentable next week. If I get the job? New wardrobe: one without sunscreen stains, holes, or bleach spots.

I will dress nothing like this.

This month, I’ve been lucky enough to pull in some freelancing gigs that have been great. If I could just get 12 more of them over the next 12 months, we would be doing well. But freelancing is all ebb and flow and now that these cash cow gigs are in the past, I’m still getting my editing/writing site set up and saying yes to everything. One of the things I’m doing is working with a former writing center student on an ongoing basis while she tries very, very hard to get her diss proposal and prospectus written.

I have to say that working with her has made me so, so glad I am done with grad school. Continue reading